Ezekiel Stephan coverup explained

Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke's refusal to allow his own recusal application to be filed or heard is an unmistakable sign for the need to police the actions of The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench.

5/27/2019

"... you can’t sue a judge because they’re immune from suit for things that they do in the course of their duties."
~Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke Jan 18th 2019
Calgary Court Center

May 28th 2019 Justice J.D. Rooke refused to allow a recusal application against himself to even be filed in the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench. This, just one week before the beginning of the Stephan trial, where he will remain as the CMJ and be able to continue to suppress evidence of state wrongdoing.

Judge J.D Rooke of the Court of Queen's Bench

Source Vocabulary.com

"If it can't be even filed, you can't appeal it. There is no official record to work from. Justice Rooke is obstructing Justice in everyway he can and he thinks he's immune," said Stephan during a conference call with a member of his investigative team and family members.

During his meeting with investigators and family David indicated that he has tried to work with Justice Rooke. "I've been polite and courteous and have done everything asked or ordered. But I have a wife and children who need protection from this man who has declared he will be the evidentiary gatekeeper through the trial. There is no doubt in my mind that he intends to continue assisting in the coverup that took place 7 years ago. He intends to hurt my wife and children and he is doing everything he can to prevent a fair trial"

Recusal applications are heard before and during trials when a litigant determines that they have a reason to believe a Judge has a conflict of interest or bias that would affect the outcome of the case. In this case Justice Rooke has determined he will remain involved in the case throughout the trial as Case Management Judge over Voir Dires. Voir Dires would usually fall to the Trial Judge.

Rejected Court Documents show clear examples of Breach of Trust where ACJ Rooke was abusive, ruled in opposition to Supreme Court Case law and is clearly identified to have bias against human rights activists who have been flagged by the government.

After reading the following document you will have no doubt as to why Judge Rooke would refuse to allow this document to become a part of the Court record.

Rooke's crusade against self litigants spills into the Stephan trial.

January 18, 2019 Transcripts highlight, clear abuses of Judicial authority entrusted to Justice Rooke in the following ways:

Refusal to allow the Stephan's to respond after Crown Submissions.
Arguing with the Crown and Stephans that he did not have jurisdiction to award costs.
Repeatedly asking the Crown for help and getting upset when they had nothing to offer.
A declaration of immunity from relief sought by victims seeking assistance from the Courts for Charter breaches committed by Justices.
Refusal to weigh any evidence that was damaging to the State.
A declaration that he would not tell the Stephans how to have their evidence heard.
Conflating of Civil and Criminal Law so as to avoid awarding of costs.
An offer to the Crown to compel the Stephan's to pay costs for the Stephans application for relief (so that they could afford legal representation in the upcoming criminal trial).

A letter written to the Stephan's show's ACJ Rooke's clear intention to remain in control of Evidentiary Voir Dires during the trial.

12 Comments

Joseph G. Emond

5/29/2019 04:07:07 pm

To whom,

Re. Judge(s?) immune from behaviour(s?) / in application of their duties in their Court...

Isn’t it about time for a review of court procedures? It might make living, existing, and occasionally — and allegedly —
running afoul of “a law” and surviving that process, knowing it was addressed and processed ( via actual due process) by officers of the Court and including its magistrates?

Interesting that the seemingly appointed guardians of all things lawful and/or unlawful in the Courts are allowed more than an unequal share of determination as to whom the lawfulness applies, and to whom — it is only understood by a few — those laws can be dismissed as a matter of ultimate immunity?

Joseph G. Emond
Calgary, AB

N.B.Without prejudice and with all due respect.

Max Stadnyk

5/30/2019 07:57:30 am

Dude...when your rights are violated in civil court, tough titty. Then can and will do as they please in their private courts.
You can absolutely bring suit against ANYONE in common law court (Queen's Bench). Not a judge...but the person who is the judge. That is how you hold them accountable. Show how the person violated your rights contrary to the position they hold.
You are wasting your time in civil court. They will run circles around you.

Jon

7/12/2019 12:09:43 pm

John D. Rooke is very unprofessional, corrupt and think he is above the law and can use his authority to do whatever he likes. The fact he has not been stopped makes you wonder if the judicial system can be trusted. He lacks ethical conduct and self-represented litigants are always to be punished he believes.

David Moll

10/22/2019 07:38:11 pm

Today Oct. 22, 2019 at ABCA a senior octogenarian asked the court to stay a $5000.00 fine imposed upon him by justice C. Dario of the QB court pending the full panel hearing of his Appeal. The request to stay is for delaying the fine, pending the full panel hearing of the judicial bias, hate, delegitimization, double standard and demonization of a senior to be heard in about 4-5 months by the Alberta Court of Appeal.

The request for stay came about because the QB court ‘ordered’ to incarcerate this grandfather for 30 days on November 8, 2019, since he cannot pay the fine since the only source of income is his government pension income which includes his Canada Pension and his Old Age Pension.

Justice Barbara Veldhuis of the Alberta Court of Appeal ‘ignored’ both the law and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions by dismissing this Octogenarian seeking a ’stay’ on a court order fining him $5K for a civil contempt charge that of visiting his friends in Olds AB. Both the The Canada Pension Plan Act and the Old Age Security Act contain a provision that a benefit:

"shall not be assigned, charged, attached, anticipated or given as security, and any transaction
purporting to assign, charge, attach, anticipate or give as security a benefit is void.”
Case: Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) v. O’Brien, 1995 CanLII 7053 (ON S.C.).
http://www.advocacycentreelderly.org/appimages/file/CPP_&_OAS_Benefits_Exempt_from_Garnishment(1).pdf

Both the law as well as case law specifically states seniors pensions cannot enrich government coffers. Because of this judge's decisions, this 84 year old grandfather of grandchildren who were put into a forced adoption situation, will be jailed. This grandfather also has serious medical issues that if he is jailed he may die there. There is such a thing as ‘elder abuse’ and this seems to be sitting on the ‘cutting edge’ of an elder being abused by the government institution of justice ‘stable of civil servants’ who wittingly ‘ignore’ the rule of law, and the precedent-setting case law, and just do as they are directed to do by external third party’s whose intent is the demonization, delegitimization of an octogenarian on a civil contempt violation. Apparently there is no empathy, compassion nor mercy to be found in the court house, let alone justice.

Where is the justice?

Margrette

11/9/2020 09:33:00 pm

We are living through a similar situation. I am not sure if I understand it correctly so if someone could correct me if I am wrong. In the Alberta Court Act, it says you cannot be held in contempt of court in a CIVIL CASE for defying an order to pay money. Or criminal cases? Am I wrong in how I interpreted it ALBERTA Court Act 9.6 section 5?

David Drover

10/25/2019 10:33:51 pm

Rooke is corrupted, big time!! In APEGA v. Drover in an Edmonton Court Room on May 24, 2017 the last thing he muttered to me as he left the courtroom was the next time I was in his courtroom I’d “better bring a toothbrush” and I’m pretty certain it wasn’t an invite to his home the next time I was in court in Edmonton. This was after I’d basically begged for forgiveness for allegations by the Plaintiff that I didn’t do in order to escape the 60 days jail time the Plaintiff was seeking... it’s all in the court transcripts!!

Terry L. Brisebois link

11/29/2022 07:41:23 am

PLEASE CONTACT ME ASAP. Rooke will be 75 soon even if he is not coherant. Father time will catch up to him. NON Judges to be criminally charged /

Terry Brisebois

5/8/2021 04:44:08 am

403 992 1244 cell number. ROOKE IS CORRUPT AS IS A FEW SENIOR LAWYERS HE COVERS FOR. PLEASE CONTACT ME.

Ali Ayyazi

1/21/2023 10:01:20 am

No one can run from an audit, not even in retirement. Corruption has a long list of damaged and harmed people on the other end. Once they all learn how to do an audit, that contract these public service providers are suppose to be offering in good faith, but have turned their backs on can go back to any years. Why? - its all about the money and guess where the money stops? (at the Treasury, and not just one or two Treasuries. Since the Treasury is responsible for issuing monies to all Courts, government agencies, and as these agencies are "acting" (supposedly in service for the people, even the people can contact the Treasury and request an audit on their cases, shut their cases permanently and audit all public services that came into proximity to the case.). These public officers are playing with their lives, and everything but doing their job is simply theatre.

Daniel link

10/23/2021 03:03:31 pm

Angelic Law is friends with the Stephan family and am in the process of taking down Rooke the Crooke et al with a Commercial Lien.

Interested in discussing further, please give Daniel a call @ Angelic Law... (587) 575 8759

11/29/2022 07:39:12 am

Please contact me-- this is criminal-not civil.
Criminal investigation has commenced. Remember ROOKE has to retire at age 75. He can face criminal courts at that time. Father time will have his way with ROOKE. AMEN.

sandra olson

6/16/2022 10:17:41 am

there is a story in the vancouver sun today where Rooke is attacking a lawyer for helping a NOT LAW litigant,, today is june 16 2022, page NP3. judge threatens to fine lawyer in rare ruling, please read,, Now that i have updated myself on rooke,,, i will attempt a response, in invite anyone else here to do the same,

Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke's refusal to allow his own recusal application to be filed or heard is an unmistakable sign for the need to police the actions of The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench.

Rejected Court Documents show clear examples of Breach of Trust where ACJ Rooke was abusive, ruled in opposition to Supreme Court Case law and is clearly identified to have bias against human rights activists who have been flagged by the government.

Rooke's crusade against self litigants spills into the Stephan trial.

Leave a Reply.

Archives

Categories